VRP Product Workshop

0

About You (Anonymous)

These optional demographic fields help us analyse feedback by group. No personally identifiable information is collected.

Role Category

Region

Experience with VRP Products

First time attending a VRP workshop?

1

Feedback per Product Session

For each workshop session, please rate Content Quality (depth, accuracy, usefulness), Presenter Effectiveness (clarity, engagement, pace) and Hands-on Relevance (practical exercises, real-world applicability).
Rating scale: ★ = Poor | ★★ = Below Average | ★★★ = Average | ★★★★ = Good | ★★★★★ = Excellent

Session	Content Quality	Presenter Effectiveness	Hands-on Relevance

1b. Which session was most valuable to you and why?

1c. Which session was least valuable to you and why?

1d. Were there any sessions where the depth of content was not appropriate (too basic or too advanced)?

2

Subjects Missed or with Little Added Value

2a. Were there any topics or product areas you expected to be covered but were not included in the workshop?

2b. Which of the following topics would you have liked to see included or expanded upon?

Select all that apply.

Other (please specify)

2c. Were there any sessions or sub-topics that felt redundant or provided little added value given your role?

2d. How would you rate the overall balance between theory/presentation and hands-on exercises?

Far too much theory Slightly too much theory Well balanced Slightly too many exercises Far too many exercises

3

Product Improvement Suggestions

Based on what you learned and experienced during the workshop, we'd love to hear your ideas for improving VRP products.

3a. Which product area do you think needs the most improvement to better support your day-to-day work?

Select one.

3b. Please describe specific pain points, feature gaps or usability issues you currently experience with VRP products.

3c. Do you have concrete feature requests or improvement ideas for any of the products covered?

3d. Thinking about the test automation sessions (E2E, API, Performance, Golden Basket), what improvements would make the testing tools more effective for your team?

3e. Regarding VE Offer Attributes & General Features — are there capabilities you need that are not yet available?

3f. How would you rate the documentation quality for the products and tools presented?

Very poor Poor Adequate Good Excellent

3g. Any other product-related feedback or ideas?

4

Logistics, Organisation & Timing

Help us improve the workshop experience beyond the content itself.

4a. Please rate the following organisational aspects.

Aspect	Rating (1–5)

4b. How did you find the overall workshop duration (3 days)?

Too short Slightly short Just right Slightly long Too long

4c. Was the daily schedule (start time, breaks, end time) appropriate?

4d. Were the technical setup and infrastructure (lab environment, connectivity, devices) adequate for the hands-on exercises?

Completely inadequate Needs improvement Adequate Good Excellent

4e. Did you receive pre-workshop communication (agenda, prerequisites, logistics) well in advance?

Not at all Partially, too late Yes, with enough time

4f. Comments on venue, catering, or any other logistical aspects?

5

Overall Assessment

5a. How would you rate the workshop overall?

★ ★ ★ ★ ★

5c. What is the single most important change we should make for the next workshop?

5d. Would you be interested in attending a follow-up workshop? If yes, which topics should it focus on?

5e. Any additional comments, praise, or constructive criticism?